The rise of artificial intelligence in writing raises critical questions about labor, equity, and access in the creative industries. While some tout AI as a tool for democratization, progressives must critically examine its potential to exacerbate existing inequalities and devalue the work of human writers. Stephen Marche's perspective, while acknowledging the need for adaptation, requires a more nuanced consideration of the socio-economic impacts of AI on working writers.

The controversy surrounding Mia Ballard's 'Shy Girl' is symptomatic of a larger problem: the lack of transparency and ethical guidelines surrounding AI in publishing. The fact that a publisher initially accepted a book potentially generated by AI, only to withdraw it after public outcry, reveals a disturbing willingness to prioritize profit over ethical considerations and the integrity of human authorship. This incident underscores the need for greater scrutiny and regulation of AI's use in creative fields.

Marche's observation that a large percentage of college students are using AI regularly should not be taken as a sign of progress. Instead, it suggests a systemic pressure to conform to automated processes, potentially stifling creativity and critical thinking. The automation of 'quotidian language' tasks, such as writing essays and memos, may appear efficient but ultimately undermines the development of crucial writing skills and critical analysis.

While Marche claims that AI cannot replicate the 'deeper power of language,' this assertion overlooks the potential for AI to be used to manipulate and exploit language in ways that perpetuate bias and misinformation. The ability of AI to generate convincing but false narratives poses a significant threat to social justice and democratic discourse.

The framing of AI as a choice between resistance and automation presents a false dichotomy. A progressive approach demands a third option: empowering writers to use AI ethically and strategically, while simultaneously advocating for policies that protect their rights and livelihoods. This includes ensuring fair compensation for AI-assisted work, promoting transparency in the use of AI in publishing, and investing in education and training programs that equip writers with the skills they need to thrive in the digital age.

The claim that 'language is now power' rings hollow when that power is concentrated in the hands of tech companies and corporations. A truly equitable approach to AI in writing requires a redistribution of power, ensuring that writers and communities have a say in how these technologies are developed and deployed.