Washington D.C. - A report by the Bitcoin Policy Institute sheds light on the coordinated efforts of foreign interests and wealthy individuals to undermine the development of environmentally responsible artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure in the United States, potentially jeopardizing local communities and workers' livelihoods.

The report, "Foreign Influence in the Campaign against American AI," uncovers a concerning nexus between a nonprofit network funded by tech tycoon Neville Roy Singham, Chinese media outlets, and foreign dark money, all allegedly converging to block the construction of U.S. AI data centers. This obstruction, framed as resistance to technological advancement, could have far-reaching consequences for the transition to a green economy and the creation of sustainable jobs.

At the heart of the controversy lies Neville Roy Singham, an American expatriate based in Shanghai, accused of leveraging his network of nonprofit organizations, including CodePink, to amplify Chinese propaganda. These groups have reportedly opposed U.S. AI infrastructure projects, aligning their messaging with narratives disseminated by Chinese media. CodePink recently criticized a data center project in Utah, raising concerns about the environmental impact and potential displacement of local communities.

The report also highlights the role of foreign dark money from billionaires like Hansjörg Wyss and Alan Parker in funding opposition to U.S. AI data centers. The lack of transparency surrounding these financial flows raises serious ethical questions about the influence of wealthy individuals on policy decisions that affect the public good, particularly regarding environmentally conscious development.

Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced the "AI Data Center Moratorium Act" in March. Shortly after, Sanders hosted a Capitol Hill event titled "The Existential Threat of AI," featuring panelists with ties to the Chinese government, including Zeng Yi and Xue Lan. While the motivations behind the legislation and event are subject to debate, critics argue they inadvertently provide a platform for foreign interests seeking to hinder U.S. technological advancement.

Fox News Digital reported on Singham's marriage to Jodie Evans, co-founder of CodePink, and his alleged funneling of $285 million into six nonprofits through shell companies and a donor-advised fund at Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs reportedly terminated the fund in 2024. This financial maneuvering raises concerns about the potential misuse of philanthropic channels to advance political agendas.

The allegations in the Bitcoin Policy Institute report underscore the need for greater scrutiny of foreign influence in U.S. policy debates, especially those concerning the development of sustainable technologies and their impact on local communities. It is crucial to ensure that all stakeholders have a voice in shaping the future of AI and that decisions are made in the best interests of the public good, not just the wealthy elite.

The report calls for increased transparency in campaign finance and lobbying activities, as well as stronger regulations to prevent foreign interference in domestic policy decisions. It also emphasizes the importance of supporting independent journalism and investigative reporting to expose hidden agendas and hold powerful actors accountable.

The implications of this report extend beyond the specific issue of AI data centers. It highlights the broader challenge of ensuring that technological development is guided by ethical principles and serves the needs of all members of society, particularly those who are most vulnerable to its negative impacts.

Sources:

* Bitcoin Policy Institute: "Foreign Influence in the Campaign against American AI" (2026) * U.S. Senate: Legislative records for the "AI Data Center Moratorium Act." * Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) - Research on the economic impact of green technology