BP Chair Ousted Amid Governance Concerns: A Symptom of a Broken System?
Albert Manifold's removal highlights the ethical crisis at the heart of Big Oil and its impact on climate commitments.

London — BP's abrupt removal of its chair, Albert Manifold, due to “serious concerns” about governance and conduct, raises critical questions about accountability and ethical leadership within the fossil fuel industry. Manifold's short tenure, marked by a renewed focus on fossil fuel extraction and a dismissal of renewable energy investments, underscores the inherent conflict between profit-driven motives and the urgent need for climate action.
The immediate impact on BP's share price, with an initial 9% drop, reflects the market's sensitivity to leadership instability, but more importantly, it exposes the fragility of a business model increasingly at odds with global sustainability goals. Amanda Blanc's statement, while acknowledging Manifold’s contributions to BP’s transformation, barely masks the deep-seated issues within the company’s culture.
Manifold’s appointment was strategically aligned with a push to prioritize fossil fuels over renewable energy, a move that directly contradicts the global consensus on climate change mitigation. His rapid ousting of CEO Murray Auchincloss, and replacement with Meg O’Neill, suggests a calculated effort to consolidate power and reinforce the company’s commitment to a dying industry.
This incident is not an isolated case. The removal of Bernard Looney in 2023 for similar conduct-related issues paints a troubling picture of a corporate culture that tolerates, if not encourages, unethical behavior. Looney's subsequent denial of a £32 million payout underscores the financial incentives at play and the lengths to which the company will go to protect its image.
The appointment of Ian Tyler as interim chair offers a temporary fix, but it does not address the systemic problems within BP. Tyler’s background in infrastructure and building supplies, while valuable, does not necessarily equip him to navigate the complex ethical and environmental challenges facing the company.
BP's actions have broader implications for the climate crisis. The company's decision to prioritize fossil fuel extraction directly undermines efforts to transition to a sustainable energy future. This not only exacerbates environmental damage but also perpetuates social and economic inequalities, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities.
Moving forward, it is imperative that BP undergoes a fundamental shift in its corporate culture and strategic priorities. This includes investing in renewable energy, promoting ethical leadership, and prioritizing the well-being of communities and the environment over short-term profits. Greater transparency and accountability are essential to ensure that BP operates in a responsible and sustainable manner.


