Charities and Communities Condemn 'Arrogant' Government Plan to Warehouse Asylum Seekers in Remote Barracks
The Home Office faces fierce backlash over plans to expand isolated military camps that cost taxpayers more than hotels while depriving vulnerable people of stability.

The UK government’s asylum policy has faced sharp condemnation from human rights organizations and local communities following the announcement of plans to establish three new accommodation centers at former military bases. The Home Office is seeking planning permission to build "basic" housing units at MOD Bicester in Oxfordshire, RAF Barnham in Suffolk, and RAF Linton-on-Ouse in North Yorkshire. The expansion is designed to hold up to 3,750 asylum claimants in highly isolated environments.
In addition to these new sites, ministers are moving to extend the lifespans of existing barracks. The government plans to keep the Crowborough site in East Sussex open until 2030 and the Wethersfield base in Essex operational beyond 2027. Wethersfield will also see its capacity increased by 400 spaces, meaning up to 1,200 vulnerable men will be contained at the site. Refugee advocates argue that this policy of confinement repeats the dangerous, legally contested mistakes of past administrations.
Imran Hussain, director of external affairs at the Refugee Council, strongly criticized the government's approach, emphasizing the deep social and human costs of these remote camps. Citing reports from the government's own spending watchdog, the National Audit Office, Hussain pointed out that military barracks are actually more expensive to run than hotels. He warned that placing people miles away from towns isolates those fleeing war and persecution from essential services, legal support, and the community solidarity necessary to rebuild their lives in safety.
Local opposition has quickly mobilized, drawing on historical victories against similar state-imposed housing schemes. In Bicester, where a 2001 proposal to build asylum housing was defeated by community protests, planning delays, and soaring costs, locals are questioning the government's memory. Calum Miller, the Liberal Democrat MP for Bicester and Woodstock, called the proposal a "political fix" that merely swaps one failed, expensive, and unsuitable institutional model for another while ignoring the concerns of local residents.
In North Yorkshire, the Linton-on-Ouse Action Group is preparing to resist the proposals once again. Nicola David, a leading member of the group, described the announcement as a "real gut punch." In 2022, local campaigns successfully proved that warehousing hundreds of asylum seekers in a tiny, remote village was the "wrong plan, wrong place." David reaffirmed that the plan remains fundamentally flawed and inhumane, emphasizing that isolating traumatized people in remote locations is entirely unsuitable.
