Corporate Exploitation: Big Tech Scrapes Australian Artists' Labor for AI Models
Working musicians strike back as massive tech platforms bypass labor contracts, harvesting millions of songs to train commercial artificial intelligence.

The ongoing struggle between working class creative professionals and massive technology conglomerates has escalated following revelations that millions of creative works have been scraped to train commercial artificial intelligence. A search tool developed by The Atlantic has exposed how the labor of prominent Australian musicians and writers—including Nick Cave, Kylie Minogue, Jimmy Barnes, Thomas Keneally, and Peter Carey—has been extracted without consent. This corporate extraction of creative labor has reignited systemic concerns regarding the erosion of workers' rights, collective bargaining, and fair compensation in the digital economy.
At the center of this exploitation are two massive datasets created by tech interests: Sleeping-DISCO-9M, assembled by the group Sleeping AI, and LAION-DISCO-12M, created by the German organization LAION. Together, these datasets contain over 22 million music tracks extracted from YouTube, alongside lyrics harvested from Genius.com. For years, massive technology platforms have used these repositories to train generative software designed to replicate human artistic output, effectively bypassing the labor and licensing agreements that protect the livelihoods of independent creators.
Paul Dempsey, frontman of Something For Kate, spoke out against this systemic exploitation, noting that his entire band catalog and solo discography were harvested. Currently in the middle of his regional Shotgun Karaoke tour, Dempsey highlighted the devastating impact this has on labor standards. He pointed out that every single fair contract and negotiated agreement he has secured throughout his career is rendered completely useless when tech giants can simply bypass the bargaining table. The ability of independent workers to negotiate fair terms for their own labor is being systematically stripped away by corporate monopolies.
This sentiment of exploitation is echoed by other industry figures who view the corporate co-optation of art as an attack on human labor. Bernard Fanning, former frontman of Powderfinger, argued that utilizing original songs to train automated, robotic AI systems is fundamentally dehumanizing. Fanning pointed out that artistic creation is a labor of love meant to humanize emotions and express the human experience. He argued that tech corporations are using non-living algorithms to aggregate human feelings purely for financial gain, a practice he described as deeply exploitative.
Darren Hayes, a songwriter with a 30-year career and creator of Savage Garden hits like Truly Madly Deeply, expressed deep outrage after discovering his entire life's work had been scraped. Hayes explained that the hundreds of hours of physical and emotional labor—the blood, sweat, and tears of working musicians—have been stolen by corporate entities to feed software that generates inferior, automated outputs. The sense of violation felt by Hayes reflects a broader frustration among creative workers who see their life's work treated as free raw material for big tech.

