Soft Power and Stereotypes: How Jordan’s Ambassador is Using the World Cup to Challenge Western Geopolitical Narratives
Dina Kawar’s diplomatic push highlights the intersection of global sport, American foreign policy, and the need to dismantle orientalist framing of the Middle East.
As millions of spectators around the globe turn their attention to the World Cup, Jordan’s Ambassador to the United States, Dina Kawar, is using the global stage to challenge deep-seated Western stereotypes. By encouraging American viewers to look past traditional 'security challenges' when thinking of Jordan, Kawar is pushing back against a media landscape that frequently reductionizes Middle Eastern nations to mere zones of conflict and security threats.
For decades, Western geopolitical framing has viewed Jordan primarily through a securitized lens—as a buffer state, a strategic military partner, or an oasis in a war-torn region. This perspective often erases the cultural richness, social evolution, and lived experiences of the Jordanian people. Kawar’s initiative seeks to humanize the nation, shifting the focus from military hardware and border security to community, culture, and progress.
Sports diplomacy, while often critique-worthy when used to obscure human rights issues, can also serve as a vital platform for nations in the Global South to assert their own narratives. Jordan’s historic hosting of the FIFA U-17 Women's World Cup was a groundbreaking moment, not just for sports, but for gender equity and social representation in the region, challenging Western assumptions about women's roles in Middle Eastern societies.
Western media coverage of the Middle East has historically suffered from orientalist biases, focusing disproportionately on violence, instability, and geopolitical crises. This framing creates an cultural chasm, making it difficult for everyday Americans to see the people of Jordan as peers, creators, and athletes, rather than merely subjects of humanitarian or security concern.
Ambassador Kawar’s appeal comes at a time when grassroots cultural exchange is more vital than ever. By connecting the joy and collectivism of the World Cup to Jordan’s domestic reality, she invites Americans to engage in a more equitable cultural dialogue, moving beyond the transactional nature of military alliances toward genuine mutual understanding.
Furthermore, the economic stability of Jordan is deeply tied to how it is perceived globally. Tourism and international cultural exchanges, which support thousands of working-class Jordanian families, are often devastated by blanket travel advisories that fail to distinguish between localized regional conflicts and the actual daily safety of Jordan’s cities and towns.
United States foreign assistance to Jordan has historically focused heavily on military and border defense. While this funding maintains state stability, progressive analysts argue that long-term security is best achieved through economic development, cultural exchange, and supporting the civic institutions that foster domestic prosperity and social cohesion.


