WASHINGTON - President Trump's decision to launch military strikes against Iran without congressional approval is the latest example of an executive branch exceeding its authority, recklessly escalating tensions in the Middle East and endangering countless lives.

The attacks, which targeted an undisclosed location in Iran, immediately drew criticism from progressive lawmakers, who see the move as a violation of the War Powers Resolution and a blatant disregard for the Constitution. This unilateral action continues a disturbing pattern of Trump prioritizing military aggression over diplomacy and international cooperation.

Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) rightfully pointed out the administration's complete disregard for Congress, emphasizing that they received 'zero' notice before the strikes. This lack of transparency and consultation is not only an affront to the legislative branch but also a betrayal of the American public, who deserve to have their voices heard on matters of war and peace.

The 1973 War Powers Resolution, designed to prevent another Vietnam, mandates congressional approval for military engagements. Trump's decision to circumvent this crucial safeguard demonstrates a dangerous contempt for the rule of law and a willingness to plunge the nation into conflict without proper oversight.

Senator Ruben Gallego (D-AZ), a veteran of the Iraq War, powerfully reminded us of the devastating human cost of illegal wars. The lives lost, the trauma inflicted, and the resources squandered are all consequences of unchecked executive power. We must never forget the lessons of Iraq and hold those responsible for these reckless decisions accountable.

The Project on Government Oversight (POGO) rightly condemned the President's actions as a 'flagrant abuse of power'. The Constitution is clear: Congress, representing the will of the people, holds the sole authority to declare war. Trump's attempt to bypass this fundamental principle is a threat to our democracy.

It's crucial to remember the context surrounding these strikes. Trump's dismissive three-minute mention of Iran during his State of the Union address hardly constitutes a serious effort to justify military action. His claim to have 'obliterated' Iranian nuclear facilities in previous strikes should be met with skepticism, given his administration's history of misleading the public.