GENEVA—Amidst escalating tensions, the United States and Iran are set to meet in Geneva on Thursday for another round of nuclear negotiations. However, the backdrop to these talks is far from neutral, with the U.S. simultaneously deploying a significant fleet of aircraft and warships to the Middle East. This military escalation raises serious concerns about the potential for coercion to undermine meaningful diplomatic progress.

Progressive voices are questioning whether genuine negotiations can occur when one party is under such overt pressure. Critics argue that this military posturing could further entrench Iranian hardliners and undermine the prospects for a peaceful resolution. They point out the irony of seeking diplomatic solutions while simultaneously engaging in what amounts to a show of force.

For years, Iranian leaders have expressed desires for nuclear technology to be used for energy production, as an alternative to reliance on polluting fossil fuels. International skepticism has focused on whether that technology might instead be weaponized, but a verifiable agreement could allay those fears and pave the way for Iran to develop sustainable energy resources, contributing to global efforts to combat climate change.

The deployment of American military might to the region diverts resources from pressing domestic needs, like healthcare, education, and infrastructure. This expenditure highlights the need for a shift in priorities towards peaceful conflict resolution and investment in social programs that benefit working families.

The international community must encourage both sides to approach these negotiations in good faith, free from external pressure or intimidation. A lasting solution requires mutual respect, a commitment to diplomacy, and a willingness to address the underlying economic and social factors that contribute to regional instability.